PDA

View Full Version : Washington Alert: Bill Places Numerous Regulations on Dog Breeders and Owners


Elaine
02-26-2009, 01:34 PM
Just got this from AKC

http://www.akc.org/news/index.cfm?article_id=3746



[Thursday, February 26, 2009]
A bill has been introduced in the Washington State Legislature to limit dog ownership and impose numerous regulations on responsible breeders and dog owners. All Washington responsible dog owners and breeders are encouraged to contact their State Senator and express their opposition to Senate Bill 5651.

The American Kennel Club (AKC) rejects the unsubstantiated legislative findings of Senate Bill 5651, which state that large-scale breeding increases the likelihood that dogs will be denied basic care, and suggest that large scale breeding facilities are more likely to fall below even the most basic standards of humane housing and husbandry. These findings, among others, incorrectly imply that all large-scale breeders are irresponsible by nature, and ignore the many responsible breeders who care for their dogs and ensure they are placed with good, loving homes.

AKC’s mission includes working to protect the rights of all dog owners and promoting responsible dog ownership. The AKC abhors neglectful treatment of dogs and strongly supports the humane treatment including providing an adequate and nutritious diet, clean living conditions, regular veterinary care, kind and responsive human companionship and training in appropriate behavior–regardless of whether the dogs are in a kennel, shelter, or even someone’s home. AKC also believes that numerical limits do not address the underlying issues of responsible ownership and proper dog care. Instead, the AKC supports reasonable and enforceable laws that protect the welfare and health of all dogs without restricting the rights of owners or breeders who take their responsibilities seriously.

If adopted, Senate Bill 5651 (click here to read the bill) would impose numerous unenforceable provisions. These include:

Prohibiting tail docking, ear cropping, debarking, and surgical birth except under anesthesia from a licensed veterinarian.

Prohibiting anyone from owning, possessing, controlling, or having charge or custody of more than 50 "breeding" dogs over the age of six months at any time.

Allowing for a warrantless search by any animal control officer or "other authorized public health or safety official", either upon the receipt of a complaint or upon "the officer’s own motion".

Exempting public animal shelters, nonprofit humane societies/animal adoption organizations, veterinary facilities, retail pet stores, research institutions, boarding facilities, and grooming facilities from the standards of care required in this bill. WHAT YOU CAN DO:

We urge all responsible dog breeders and owners in Washington to contact their State Senator and respectfully, yet strongly urge them to oppose Senate Bill 5651.

I object to the provisions highlighted in red above: I object to warrantless searches (they are unconstitutional). Pet stores and grooming facilities can be the filthiest most inhumane of places and they should not be exempt from the standard of care required under this bill, but otherwise, no one should be cropping, debarking or doing a cesarean without proper anesthesia administered by a trained, licensed, accountable professional, and what the heck does anyone need with "more than 50 breeding animals"?

andyhilt27
02-26-2009, 06:54 PM
Where did they come up with the number 50? I can understand it may be difficult to put a set number on a puppy mill. Some people could have 15 to 20 dogs in their kennel and still give them a great quality of life. I couldn't....not by myself. I have my quota of dogs right now, 2 1/2. 50 seems like it would be a bit much for anyone to handle. I would love to see that number lowered. Then again, I don't like being told what to do, so I don't want to see a number at all. I know my limits and they aren't even close to 50.

50 breeding dogs. I can't get over this. Most of them will be bitches of course. Not that there is anything wrong with bitches....just a thought.

I was hoping President Obama and family would select a Doberman. It would have done a lot for the public perception of the breed.

Elaine
02-26-2009, 08:04 PM
I too am having difficulty understanding why we are supposed to object to a limit of 50 breeding animals. The number is far far far too high. I think objecting to this number is a public relations nightmare for us. It makes us all look like we favor puppy mills and high volume commercial breeders. This strategy of opposing all regulation and never giving an inch weakens our (the AKC’s) position with the public. This strategy allows animal rights people to portray us as inflexible and unwilling to be part of the solution to curb the production of animals bred solely for profit. Clearly, if you’ve got anywhere near 50 breeding animals, you’re in it for the $$$ profit. You’re making your mortgage payment breeding dogs.

Lou's mom
02-26-2009, 11:32 PM
I too am having difficulty understanding why we are supposed to object to a limit of 50 breeding animals. The number is far far far too high. I think objecting to this number is a public relations nightmare for us. It makes us all look like we favor puppy mills and high volume commercial breeders.

Not gonna tell Andy how many critters he can have :p, but we all know how much time & energy 1 thru 5 or 6 (or 13) dobers is...

50? I be wrapping up one feeding cycle/breakfast & it'd be time to start the next/dinner. :eek:

If AKC wants to make money on purebred dogs, why don't they just set up a 'bizness' division & 'accredit' those high occupancy 'kennels' that way?

Lou's mom
02-26-2009, 11:37 PM
I was hoping President Obama and family would select a Doberman. It would have done a lot for the public perception of the breed.

My 1st dober grew up in Atlanta, and even at 4 months in ear tape, our fellow residents in the historic Martin Luther King district would cross the street so they weren't walking on 'our' side. :rolleyes: